These Clinton haters are at it again.
Last time Comey addressed the Clinton emails the Clinton camp spun it to sound like Comey cleared Clinton of all wrongdoing. That was of course, a lie. Comey never cleared Clinton, in fact, he said Clinton misused her email system and did send top secret emails off her private email system. And he added her email could have been hacked and normally would be disciplined for such action, but he brought no charges. Showing a disregard for sensitive information on Clinton's part and a total lack of government communication processes.
Now the Clinton haters are going nuts over Comey's latest statement. As usual, the Clinton haters want it both ways. It's hilarious that this was all caused by Clinton's pervert buddy who was already caught sending dick pics through his phone. Now he has been caught sending inappropriate material to a minor, so of course the FBI investigated all his emails and what do you know, Clinton appears on those emails. As I have said many times, get ready for a Clinton presidency that is full of scandals. Her working character is secretive and dishonest. She responds with lies and hate, and her supporters are even worse than her.
I've already received my daily vulgar hate mail and death threats from Dervish Sanders and his hate buddies this morning. I guess they were up all night (drunk) thinking up words like cocksucker and other vulgarities to send me. Just like Clinton's pervert buddy. These Clinton haters learn from their leader. Just as Clinton was an ass to Sanders (that came out of her emails also) who was a gentleman during the debates with her, going so far as to say, "I'm sick and tired of hearing about your emails". And just like Republican idiot leaders who support Trump no matter what he says, Sanders is out telling people to vote for crooked Hillary.
The only difference between Trump and Clinton, is Trump uses more vulgar language publicly. Clinton is clearly more deceptive and that makes her dangerous.
2 Responses.
01. October 31, 2016 at 9:25 PM.
Tom Harper: There sure is a lot of mutual hatred within the Democratic Party between the Progressive wing and the moderate/centrist Democrats. Bernie Sanders was my first choice, but I'm voting for Hillary, mostly to keep Trump out of the White House.
In our local Democratic Party, the Progressives are hoping to stage a takeover of the Party during an annual membership meeting in two months. I don't really disagree with either side, but I'd rather nominate an imperfect candidate who can win the election, than a more liberal candidate who goes down in flames. George W. Bush got into the White House because of so many Florida voters who voted for Ralph Nader because "there's no difference between the two parties." GW Bush proved that there's a huge difference.
02. October 31, 2016 at 9:25 PM.
Luke: HRC would not be the first high ranking official to say the government system is weak and if they want to send a truly confidential message, send it private email. Recent hackers give credence to that claim. But there is the pesky law on confidential government communications. Another problem that has to be solved.
Democrats should be aiming for more than just beating a fascist nut job, and according to the polls they might not be able to even do that.
These nasty attacks coming from the Clinton campaign are unnecessary and one reason voters see no difference between Trump and Clinton.
It was Clinton supporters who brought up the idea in 2007 that Obama might not be a real born American. Clinton put that down, but then Trump picked it up. These things have consequences, usually negative. I know the Republicans have nominated a tyrant, but that's no reason to lower expectations from the Democratic candidate. An attempt has to be made to slow partisan politics and get something done. That won't happen if the Democrats use the same ugly tactics the Republicans do, and Clinton shouldn't need to use those tactics to defeat a tyrant like Trump.
I have said many times I will not vote because my State will go for Clinton in a big way. I have also said that if that were not the case, I would certainly vote for Clinton. Of course there is a big difference between the two parties, and I don't want the Democratic party to be just Republican lite.
My attitude also reflects a personal response to the nasty pro Clinton trolls who attack this blog with over 700 nasty emails and multiple death threats, just because I point out the weaknesses of Clinton. I've only posted a few for evidence and I will not post them all, or get into a blog flame war. Dervish Sanders has also threatened to attack you, or anyone who comments here. He and his buddies are simple thugs, but the emails keep coming everyday.
| Compound Word Error: everyday (every day). |
"These Clinton haters are at it again"? That's you! YOU are the Clinton hater, idiot! Comey never said HRC would "normally would be disciplined for such action". You lie. Another lie is that "the FBI investigated all his emails and what do you know, Clinton appears on those emails". The FBI has not looked at any of the emails yet. Comey announced that they FOUND more emails. At this point they don't know what they contain.
ReplyDeleteProof TOM (AKA Luke) has been a Republican all along, I think. Back when he blogged on Stay A While he talked about "Obamamaniacs", now he refers to HRC using the Trump-created nickname "Crooked Hillary"! The PROOF of TOM's Trump-support in this post is his LAME attempt to link HRC to Anthony Weiner's sexting scandal using lies. HRC's aide is Anthony's Weiner's (soon to be ex) wife, but (aside from Huma) there is no connection between Anthony Weiner's sexting and Hillary Clinton! (Previous proof of his Trump-support is him writing "I'm rooting for Trump" in his post "Presidential Health").
Trump attempted to tie Hillary Clinton to Bill Clinton's affairs. TOM/Luke makes an even bigger and more absurd leap, with his attempt to link her to Anthony Weiner's sexting. Disgusting Trump-like tactic worthy of an under-cover Trump voter, which TOM/Luke may very well be. He is SURELY an idiot either way (Republican pretending to be a "liberal" or deluded "liberal" Hillary hater). Liberal in quotes because I think TOM is full of shit. TOM is NOT a "liberal" in my opinion, nor in the opinion of MOST Liberals (I'd wager).
BTW, I never submitted even ONE comment to TOM's Luke blog that contained the word "cocksucker". I sent him no "vulgar hate mail" or "death threats" this morning. I sent him some comments re his YouTube Bach posting (in response to his moronic comment concerning "chasing the children away from a 7-11 store"), but that was last evening. And none of them were vulgar or contained death threats. Also made AFTER his comment. So he lies about his "trolls" not making a peep because he put up a classical music YouTube.
And (as I've pointed out before) I've never sent even ONE email to TOM/Luke. Because I don't have his email address. But the moron obviously does not understand that he gets comments emailed to him... because he enabled moderation and HE entered his email address (for Blogger to send comments to). What an idiot!!
I realized (after publishing the comment above) that with his use of the term "Clinton haters", Luke refers to Clinton SUPPORTERS who are haters (people who hate). Which is still him - Luke is most definitely a hater. Although not a Clinton supporter. He supports no one, I guess. Or maybe he supports Trump. It surely would not surprise me.
DeleteAlso, as it turns out, Flying Junior used the objectionable word. Because he's mad about Luke spamming his blog. Although Luke (as the owner of the blog) could have faked the comment. But I don't think that's what happened. Because (1) I doubt Luke is intelligent enough to figure out how to fake a comment and (2) Flying Junior used the word on my blog (here). So the comment is probably his. Although I CERTAINLY can understand his anger at Luke. And that is only after a few days of being trolled by this asshole. Imagine how I feel, given the fact that I've been trolled by him for YEARS.