Showing posts with label Lying About Being Liberal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lying About Being Liberal. Show all posts

Monday, June 20, 2011

Liberal Rant

SAW-20110620.

This is a post from my WordPress blog Stay A While, along with the comments. I decided to duplicate my WordPress blog posts (along with all comments) on Blogger for posterity. Also because I lost my WordPress password and haven't been able to recover my account. So I just copied everything over and changed the publish dates. Anyway, enjoy.

Subject: A post written back when identified as Liberal (before I went insane). I still say I'm Liberal, but that assertion is a lie.

We are an independent people, working hard to scratch out a living, hopefully a good living. That leads, by necessity, to be concerned for our own families well-being and future. We are also a compassionate people, willing to help our neighbors, near and far away.

In the days of the industrial revolution, life for many of our citizens was grim. It wasn't until after WWII that a solid middle class took hold, and a majority of our citizens were able to live a much better life. One of the reasons for the up lift in our society, were the federal safety net programs started in the 1930’s, and expanded in the 1960's.

Before then if a family needed help they went to religious, fraternal, or community based groups. Lack of food, shelter, and medical care was literally causing premature death among our people. It’s no mystery that as those basic needs became more abundant, our life expectancy increased. There was much suffering. People starving and dying in the streets. Deep poverty and early death among our senior citizens. Horrible working conditions and child (slave) labor.

During the great depression the problem got so bad that even the best intentions of the good-hearted help groups, were not enough to meet the needs of even a minority of the people in need. Those groups were overwhelmed by the number of people in distress, and their contributions were down because people had less money to give.

When FDR came along, the situation was serious, a national crisis. He had some ideas to stop the suffering and help the people. Those ideas involved national programs to help the whole nation, and they worked. The people had seen and lived through enough, they were willing to give more to help ease the suffering for all. Along with new laws to curb abuses, and yes, unions to negotiate for better working conditions, life improved greatly for millions of our citizens.

If conservatives want to reject that liberal political philosophy, or call it socialist, they should remember it is part of why we claim to be the best country in the world. Many problems are to big to be left to the charity of capitalists, or the philosophy of trickle down economics. The only way a job is the best self-help program, is if that job pays enough to live within the current economic situation.

I would think that companies would want to relieve themselves from paying for medical insurance for their employees. I believe that a consumption tax is more natural for a capitalistic system than an income tax. Most of all, I can’t believe we are going to watch all the hard work and suffering our parents, grandparents, and great-grandparents put into making life so much better than anywhere else in the world, fade away because we are to selfish to care about our neighbors and the people of our whole country.

Basically I believe the government should stay out of my bedroom and out of my pockets, but it’s not a matter of one political philosophy. It's a matter of what’s best for the country.

We have to change our priorities. Is it more important to worry about whose married to who, or how we are going to meet our financial obligations? Is it more important to pander to our selfishness by saying "no new taxes", or invest in the future of our country and the well-being of our people? When does this generation (as every other generation has before us) make a real hard sacrifice to ensure the future health of this country? The sacrifice we need to make now, is a financial one, not a military one.

So what kind of society are you willing to pay for?

Libraries closed, schools closed, mental patients tossed out in the streets (where they cause crime), a 14 TRILLION dollar national debt, people dying in emergency waiting rooms, lack of proper military troop supplies, breaking our promise to our senior citizens for lack of funds (that the Congress spent on other things), a dangerous addiction to Arab oil because we won’t invest in our own fuel sources, and on, and on, and on.

Why are we no longer willing to pay to remain the best country in the world?

Why should we settle for future generations having less of a quality of life, than we have been given from our parents and grandparents?

5 Responses.

01. June 21, 2011 at 7:47 pm.

Sue: Tom, I'm sorry! I didn't know I had to update my bloglist because you switched to wordpress, I will get right on that! As always your commentary posts are well said, beautifully written, and, as always, I agree with every word.

The Republican party has gone so far right because of the tea party I’m afraid they are putting the last nails in the coffin. Their extremism is not what the country wants and I know our side will win out in the end. I've never been more confident.

02. June 22, 2011 at 7:05 am.

TOM Wordpress: I hope you are right Sue, but the evidence has been there since before the last few elections. I'm worried.

I agree that Republicans are destroying what generations of Americans have built, and are surely wrecking the future. Obviously they just don't care.
I hope Keith O. will be on through the election. We need his voice.

03. June 22, 2011 at 1:54 pm.

Sue: I don't get Current with my cable package, unfortunately. I'll have to get show updates from facebook.

BTW, I love the new blog look. It's clean, sophisticated and serene looking with that beautiful picture!

04. June 23, 2011 at 7:27 am.

Leslie Parsley: Beautifully expressed, Tom, and a good reminder of how things were. Regrettably, I share your concerns about the here and now – and the immediate future. It's as if Americans have lost their way, exchanging their humanity for hearts of hate.

05. June 25, 2011 at 11:21 am.

TOM Wordpress: Well said Leslie

We know it's a continuous fight. I need the fight Sue has , to help keep me going. As long as I keep writing, there is a little kick and care (maybe even hope) left in me

Copyright 2011 by TOM The Omelet Man. All rights reserved. Plagiarism is strictly prohibited. SAW-232.

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

By The People, For The People

SAW 20110615.

This is a post from my WordPress blog Stay A While, along with the comments. I decided to duplicate my WordPress blog posts (along with all comments) on Blogger for posterity. Also because I lost my WordPress password and haven't been able to recover my account. So I just copied everything over and changed the publish dates. Anyway, enjoy.

Subject: "I remain liberal only in the sense that as long as government is wasting our money, I would rather they waste it on programs that go to individuals, not the corporate rich, or the military".

I doubt I'm wrong when I say the Republicans most famous and beloved President, is Abraham Lincoln. He is my favorite President also.

His famous line... government by the people, for the people... shall not perish...

Seems today's Republicans do not honor President Lincoln, or agree with his description of America.

Republicans have no concern for "the people".

Before FDR, Republicans had screwed the country up so bad, they created the "Great Depression". Their policies of cut taxes back in the 1920's favoring the corporations, Wall Street, and the rich (sound familiar) left "the people" out in the cold.

One big difference back then; there were no safety net programs, to help the starving people of America. The starvation and economic collapse continued until FDR became President. FDR enacted programs like Social Security (that the majority of Americans supported) to help ease the dying and suffering.

These "social" programs saved the lives of hundreds of thousands (maybe more) of Americans. These were not "social" programs in the sense of a Socialist Stalin forced government; but were "government by the people, for the people". Americans wanted and supported these policies; proven by the majority of Americans voting for FDR an unprecedented four times. Not a political fluke, or fad by any means.

The American people also knew they had to, and did, pay for those programs by taxing themselves at a higher rate, than ever before in American History. They understood that the poverty of their fellow Americans was not only their moral responsibility, but ended the instability that was dangerous to the country. They understood, that to build the greatest country in the World took money, and plenty of it.

The dictators of the World like Stalin only had to confiscate the wealth of his country. Americans had to give, freely, through taxation, to ensure having the best military, infrastructure, space program, highway system, medical, lifestyle, etc., etc.

Seems the Americans of the 20th century understood the sacrifices needed to build the greatest country ever on the face of the Earth. Seems the Americans of the 21st century not only don't understand sacrifice for country, but selfishly want to tear down what generations of Americans have spent blood and paid their hard-earned money to build.

Who are we to be the first generation of Americans, to leave America worse off, than it was left to us? And why, because we won't cough up a few dollars?

As Republicans continue to destroy what generations of Americans have willingly built; surely they are wrecking the future of the American people. Somehow Republicans equate progress for all the people, with Socialism.

I will continue to honor Abraham Lincoln and his description of America as being "by the people and for the people".

9 Responses.

01. June 15, 2011 at 2:35 pm.

Jerry Critter: Republicans are trying to return us to the 1920's, including the lack of a safety net.

02. June 18, 2011 at 1:25 pm.

w-dervish: I thought Reagan was the most beloved Republican president. In Lincoln's day the Republicans were a reform party... this was prior to their sell-out to the wealthy and corporations.

I agree that Republicans are destroying what generations of Americans have built, and are surely wrecking the future. Obviously they just don't care.

03. June 18, 2011 at 1:45 pm.

TOM Wordpress: I thought I would get a disagreement about Lincoln being the most beloved Republican President; and I suppose today’s Republicans would rate Reagan higher than Lincoln, which only shows how off course Republicans have become. Yes, Republicans would like to go back to the governemnt of Coolidge and pre WW II.To bad they have not learned the lessons of History, or they would know that will not work. Thanks for the visititing my blog guys

04. June 19, 2011 at 2:07 pm.

dmarks: I'm all for a safety net, but not for the well-off and wealthy. They don't need it. In recent history, the Democrats have come out as being more in favor of handouts to the wealthy. Look at the massive giveaway called TARP (most Republicans voted against it), and the curious case of SCHIP... supposedly for needy children. The Democrats favored expanding it to adults of means, while the Republicans wanted it limited to needy children.

(As for my view on TARP and the Wall-Street bailouts: I side with most Republicans and a minority of more hardline leftist Democrats: I opposed it all).

05. June 19, 2011 at 2:33 pm.

w-dervish: More Republicans may have voted against TARP, but that doesn't mean they were against it. George bush signed TARP. If more Republican votes had been necessary for it to pass more Republicans would have voted for it. There was no way this thing wasn't going to pass.

Republicans knew they could vote against it, it would pass anyway, and the ILLUSION that they are in favor of the "free market" would be maintained (thus placating the portion of their deluded base that believes the "free market" nonsense).

Republicans are the ones who champion legislation that benefits the wealthy (almost exclusively). The Democrats also champion legislation that benefits the wealthy, but that's because they need money to run their campaigns (excluding blue dogs, who are really the Republican-lite wing of the Democratic Party). Democrats also champion legislation that benefits the rest of us… Legislation the Republicans almost always oppose.

06. June 19, 2011 at 3:42 pm.

dmarks: Yes, McCain and Bush supported TARP. I have no qualms about siding with hard-left Democrats on this and against Bush and McCain.

07. June 19, 2011 at 4:27 pm.

TOM Wordpress: Whatever side (Republican or Democrat) the question is, was it needed, and where would we be without them? (bailouts)

08. June 20, 2011 at 8:57 am.

dmarks: I tend to think they were not needed. Wall Street does not need any handouts. If GM and Chrysler had gone bankrupt (no bailouts) they would have survived. Bankruptcy would have merely made them much better able to fend off creditors.

09. June 20, 2011 at 11:22 pm.

TOM Wordpress: The main reason given for the use of bailout. was to save the jobs, not only for the parent companies, but other companies (jobs) down the line.

Copyright 2011 by TOM The Omelet Man. All rights reserved. Plagiarism is strictly prohibited. SAW-229.